Bagan, Mandalay, Myanmar
My mom was a baby when the Golden Gate Bridge first opened. My Grandparents took her with them and joined the throng of people,...
Homemade ice cream from Sick Science! A perfect DIY for a long weekend…
Say What Now of the Day: Pastor Charles L. Worley of Providence Road Baptist Church in Maiden, North Carolina, went on an anti-President Obama rant earlier this month during a sermon. Then he got off topic:
I figured a way to get rid of all the lesbians and queers. Build a great, big, large fence — 150- or 100-mile-long — put all the lesbians in there… Do the same thing with the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can’t get out… And you know what, in a few years, they’ll die.
He ended his sermon with this thought:
God have mercy. It makes me pukin’ sick to think about — I don’t even whether or not to say this in the pulpit — can you imagine kissing some man?
Notice the “Amens” from the congregation throughout.
That is just scary and very, very wrong and very, very not Christ-like.
And yet I’m thinking of moving to North Carolina?
Kickass Kid of the Day: As 9-year-old Josef Miles and his mother walked around Kansas’ Washburn University campus last weekend, he noticed a group of Westboro Baptist Church members picketing as people headed to graduation ceremonies.
Josef asked mom if he could create his own sign, and promptly staged a one-man protest. His sign, written in pencil on a tiny sketchpad, read simply, “God Hates No One.”
(Nuns) were the first feminists, earning Ph.D.’s or working as surgeons long before it was fashionable for women to hold jobs. As managers of hospitals, schools and complex bureaucracies, they were the first female C.E.O.’s.
They are also among the bravest, toughest and most admirable people in the world. In my travels, I’ve seen heroic nuns defy warlords, pimps and bandits. Even as bishops have disgraced the church by covering up the rape of children, nuns have redeemed it with their humble work on behalf of the neediest.
So, Pope Benedict, all I can say is: You are crazy to mess with nuns.
The Vatican issued a stinging reprimand of American nuns this month and ordered a bishop to oversee a makeover of the organization that represents 80 percent of them. In effect, the Vatican accused the nuns of worrying too much about the poor and not enough about abortion and gay marriage.
What Bible did that come from? Jesus in the Gospels repeatedly talks about poverty and social justice, yet never explicitly mentions either abortion or homosexuality. If you look at who has more closely emulated Jesus’s life, Pope Benedict or your average nun, it’s the nun hands down.
Since the papal crackdown on nuns, they have received an outpouring of support. “Nuns were approached by Catholics at Sunday liturgies across the country with a simple question: ‘What can we do to help?’ ” The National Catholic Reporter recounted. It cited one parish where a declaration of support for nuns from the pulpit drew loud applause, and another that was filled with shouts like, “You go, girl!”
At least four petition drives are under way to support the nuns. One on Change.org has gathered 15,000 signatures. The headline for this column comes from an essay by Mary E. Hunt, a Catholic theologian who is developing a proposal for Catholics to redirect some contributions from local parishes to nuns.
“How dare they go after 57,000 dedicated women whose median age is well over 70 and who work tirelessly for a more just world?” Hunt wrote. “How dare the very men who preside over a church in utter disgrace due to sexual misconduct and cover-ups by bishops try to distract from their own problems by creating new ones for women religious?”
Sister Joan Chittister, a prominent Benedictine nun, said she had worried at first that nuns spend so much time with the poor that they would have no allies. She added that the flood of support had left her breathless.
“It’s stunningly wonderful,” she said. “You see generations of laypeople who know where the sisters are — in the streets, in the soup kitchens, anywhere where there’s pain. They’re with the dying, with the sick, and people know it.”
Chag sameach, everybody.
This from a Muslim Socialist?
(Which reminds me, folks. Look at China and remember the Soviet Union. Socialist states disallow public religious practice and actually persecute religious practitioners of many stripes, even when practiced privately. Oh, and in the Middle East at least, Muslims tend not to be friends with Jews. Obama, besides being neither, can not be both Muslim and Socialist.)
As I have gone through the last few years of spiritual struggle, looking at godlessness and Christianity and wondering what, I have always had this odd thought struggle. Part of me seems willing to agree with Atheism, but not wanting to, while I have these other thoughts. I want to research people who have gone from one to the other and especially any who may have gone from Christianity to Atheism and back. I want to find strong Christian refutation to Atheist arguments. And I have always had this project in the back of my mind of reading through several translations of the Bible and molding my own interpretation with hundreds and thousands of footnotes on translation, history, and theological interpretation.
The only thing I truly know right this moment (having done none of the above) is that the most satisfied and content I have ever been in my entire life was living in a 500-acre forest on the shore of Lake Huron cleaning bathrooms and selling books and clothes to campers, taking walks through untamed woods and talking to the air, feeling that there was a response and a purpose and a reality to the spiritual and to the deity that Atheists so vehemently disagree with.
I want that again. I have been looking for it for several years now, which has led to the doubt and the seeking and the conflict that none of my family or closer friends—all strong Christians—know much about. This has to be answered on a personal, individual level, but how do I do that when I’m just struggling to get through each day?
Right now, I’m listening to a “worship” band called Sojourn and their song, “Lord, please don’t leave me” just finished. Seems appropriate.
Oxymoron. The single word that best describes me, top to bottom, front to back. And there are times I wish I would get away from that forever.
Oh, and one of the prompts for this blather? A quote on a friend’s Facebook profile.
Makes sense.
The skewed viewpoint. The mocking tone.
Yet God did not create humans with original sin. “Adam” and “Eve” chose to sin. You know, the whole “tree of the knowledge of good and evil” and the “apple”? The one tree they were supposed to not eat of. One simple rule was all they had.
But then, why did God put the tree in the garden in the first place? Why even allow the temptation in the first place? (Hmm. Have you watched Biggest Loser?)
Obviously, this is presented as literal translation of Genesis 2 because that’s all I have.
… .
And yet, Christian theology says that obviously God expected that “Adam” and “Eve” would sin, so perhaps that is accurate?
Still my views of God’s omniscience and human freedom of choice says that God knew all the options, whether “Adam” and “Eve” chose to eat the “apple” or not.
Maybe that’s an alternate universe we have yet to find.
(via usgroovykids)
“Religion has ever filled the mind of man with darkness, and kept him in ignorance of his real duties and true interests. It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover Truth, Reason, and Morality. Religion diverts us from the causes of evils, and from the remedies which nature prescribes; far from curing, it only aggravates, multiplies, and perpetuates them.”— Baron d’Holbach (via philphys)
Yeah, selfishness, greed, and pride aren’t real causes of evil at all.
(via usgroovykids)
Not fond of the “Belief-o-matic” name, but whatever.
I’d be interested to see what usgroovykids gets. And you, too.
I’m somehow either Seventh Day Adventist (100%? How?) or Orthodox Quaker. Maybe Eastern Orthodox. I’m not sure I agree with that, although I kinda like the Orthodox Quaker designation. I thought I’d be one of these guys.
“The reason why science and religion are actually incompatible is that, in the real world, they reach incompatible conclusions. It’s worth noting that this incompatibility is perfectly evident to any fair-minded person who cares to look. Different religions make very different claims, but they typically end up saying things like “God made the universe in six days” or “Jesus died and was resurrected” or “Moses parted the red sea” or “dead souls are reincarnated in accordance with their karmic burden.” And science says: none of that is true. So there you go, incompatibility.” — Sean Carroll
The reason why this argument is refutable is because Sean Carroll is a complete blowhard. Looking at myth used to explain the unexplainable to the simple does not prove your point. Claiming that billions of people throughout history are completely and irrefutably wrong with no real relation to your argument does not help your argument.
It should be perfectly clear to any non-dogmatic, truly open-minded individual who recognizes what seems obvious to many — that there is a body (physical) and there is a soul (spiritual) — that religion is concerned with the soul while science is concerned with the body.
Religion and faith are concerned with the unseen and unseeable. Science is concerned with what it can see and classify. To stretch either into the other realm in a way to eradicate the other is irresponsible and ignorant.
And yes, religion does concern itself with some aspects of the body and what is seen, obviously (how to live and what to do). Just as science does concern itself with some aspects of what would be considered the spirit, the unseen. (Psychology?) They are not in any way, though, mutually exclusive.